# The Contrapositive, Converse, and Inverse of an Implication

Definition: Let $P$ and $Q$ be statements and consider the implication $P \rightarrow Q$. The Contrapositive of this implication is the formula $\neg Q \rightarrow \neg P$. The Converse of this implication is the formula $Q \rightarrow P$. The Inverse of this implication is the formula $\neg P \rightarrow \neg Q$. |

The implication $P \rightarrow Q$ and the contrapositive $\neg Q \rightarrow \neg P$ have the property that they are logically equivalent which we prove below.

Proposition 1: Let $P$ and $Q$ be statements. Then $(P \rightarrow Q) \Leftrightarrow (\neg Q \rightarrow \neg P)$, that is, the implication $P \rightarrow Q$ is logically equivalent to the contrapositive $\neg Q \rightarrow \neg P$. |

**Proof:**We construct the truth tables $P \rightarrow Q$ and $\neg Q \rightarrow \neg P$:

$P$ | $Q$ | $P \rightarrow Q$ |
---|---|---|

T | T | T |

T | F | F |

F | T | T |

F | F | T |

$P$ | $Q$ | $\neg P$ | $\neg Q$ | $\neg Q \rightarrow \neg P$ |
---|---|---|---|---|

T | T | F | F | T |

T | F | F | T | F |

F | T | T | F | T |

F | F | T | T | T |

- Comparing the far right columns of the truth tables above and we conclude that $(P \rightarrow Q) \Leftrightarrow (\neg Q \rightarrow \neg P)$. $\blacksquare$

Similarly, the converse and inverse of the implication $P \rightarrow Q$ are logically equivalent.

Proposition 2: Let $P$ and $Q$ be statements. Then $(Q \rightarrow P) \Leftrightarrow (\neg P \rightarrow \neg Q)$, that is, the converse $Q \rightarrow P$ is logically equivalent to the inverse $\neg P \rightarrow \neg Q$ |

**Proof:**This follows immediately by proposition 1 by a change of variables. $\blacksquare$

Let $P$ be the statement “Bob is hungry” and let $Q$ be the statement “Bob will eat lunch”. The implication $P \rightarrow Q$, its contrapositive, converse, and inverse are all listed below:

- $P \rightarrow Q$: If Bob is hungry then Bob will eat lunch.

- $\neg Q \rightarrow \neg P$: If Bob doesn’t eat lunch then Bob is not hungry.

- $Q \rightarrow P$: If Bob eats lunch then Bob is hungry.

- $\neg P \rightarrow \neg Q$: If Bob is not hungry then Bob will not eat lunch.

### Related post:

- Reisch receives SUNY Chancellor’s Award | News, Sports, Jobs – Evening Observer
- An overall 2nd place for Malta in an International Mental Mathematics Challenge – Malta Independent Online
- DU Admissions 2019: Mathematics Must In Best Of Four Subjects For Admission Into Eco(H); JMC, Stephen’s Stick To Old Rule – Swarajya
- Agami Education Foundation holds teachers’ training on Teaching Mathematics by Olympiad Technique – Dhaka Tribune
- 2nd place for Malta in international Mental Mathematics Challenge – Newsbook
- Darlington pupils among most-skilled mathematics in the UK – Darlington and Stockton Times
- Women and minority faculty in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) – Open Access Government
- The messy mathematics of British Columbia’s CleanBC plan – Business in Vancouver
- All Limerick student’s hard work adds up to him winning top mathematics award in Ireland – Limerick Leader
- CMU-Q researchers explore the mathematics of personalised medicine – The Peninsula Qatar